FLOORHOLLER

Emanuel Cleaver II

U.S. House, MO District 5 · DEMOCRATIC PARTY

The most recent attempt to refresh these records was only partly successful. What you see is the last data we received on November 9, 2026. An automatic update is scheduled and will try again.

$1,766,864
Total receipts
Money the campaign reported receiving
$1,773,543
Total spending
Money the campaign reported spending
Not reported
Cash on hand
At the end of October 14, 2026

Reporting period: January 1, 2025 to October 14, 2026. Money raised after that date is not included yet. Totals are the FEC's figures and already account for amended filings and refunds as the FEC records them.

Where the money came from

Individual donors: $717,292 (41%)PACs and other committees: $1,049,558 (59%)Other reported receipts: $15 (0%)
Receipts by source
SourceAmountShare
Individual donors
Donations from individual people (itemized gifts plus small unitemized ones).
$717,29241%
PACs and other committees
Contributions from political action committees and other non-party committees.
$1,049,55859%
Other reported receipts
Computed: total receipts minus the lines above. Includes anything the FEC summary does not itemize here, such as refunds adjustments, interest or event income.
$150%

Individual donors include small gifts the campaign was not required to itemize. These categories are kept apart on purpose: a gift from a person is not a gift from a company, and a PAC is not a person.

Fundraising history by cycle

$1.8M2004 raised: $1,579,727 2004 spent: $1,521,744 20042006 raised: $669,500 2006 spent: $617,753 20062008 raised: $554,099 2008 spent: $554,041 20082010 raised: $637,380 2010 spent: $607,575 20102012 raised: $1,154,849 2012 spent: $1,191,843 20122014 raised: $986,751 2014 spent: $1,015,923 20142016 raised: $1,165,083 2016 spent: $793,180 20162018 raised: $1,172,170 2018 spent: $1,156,849 20182020 raised: $1,415,880 2020 spent: $950,094 20202022 raised: $1,215,785 2022 spent: $1,182,591 20222024 raised: $1,385,776 2024 spent: $1,457,207 20242026 raised: $1,766,864 2026 spent: $1,773,543 2026

Raised Spent

Fundraising by cycle
CycleRaisedSpentReported through
2025–2026$1,766,864$1,773,543October 14, 2026
2023–2024$1,385,776$1,457,207December 31, 2024
2021–2022$1,215,785$1,182,591December 31, 2022
2019–2020$1,415,880$950,094December 31, 2020
2017–2018$1,172,170$1,156,849December 31, 2018
2015–2016$1,165,083$793,180December 31, 2016
2013–2014$986,751$1,015,923December 31, 2014
2011–2012$1,154,849$1,191,843December 31, 2012
2009–2010$637,380$607,575December 31, 2010
2007–2008$554,099$554,041December 31, 2008
2005–2006$669,500$617,753December 31, 2006
2003–2004$1,579,727$1,521,744December 31, 2004

Largest committee contributions

Political action committees (PACs) and other committees, grouped by their FEC committee ID. This list is built from the 85 largest itemized contributions the FEC lists for the campaign, so it is a partial list, not a complete ranking. The PAC total above is the complete figure.

Largest committee contributions
CommitteeReported totalContributions
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$10,0002
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION LEAG$10,0002
MANUFACTURED HOUSING INSTITUTE PAC$10,0002
NATIONAL MULTIFAMILY HOUSING COUNCIL AND REAL ESTATE TECHNOLOGY AND TRANSFORMATION CENTER POLITICAL $10,0002
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTS, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$10,0002
NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$10,0002
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ANESTHESIOLOGISTS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (ASA PAC)$10,0002
AMERICAN CRYSTAL SUGAR COMPANY POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$10,0002
H&R BLOCK INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (BLOCKPAC)$10,0002
AMERIPAC: THE FUND FOR A GREATER AMERICA$10,0002
PURPOSE PAC$10,0002
HALLMARK CARDS, INC. PAC (HALLPAC)$10,0002
LOCKTON INC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$10,0002
HEARTLAND PATRIOTS$8,5002
THRIVENT FINANCIAL FOR LUTHERANS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE$8,5002

Largest individual contributions

Each line is one itemized gift as reported, in the donor's own words (employer and occupation are what the donor told the campaign; an employer is not the donor). Gifts are never added together by name. Information about individual contributors is public record, but federal law forbids using it to solicit contributions or for any commercial purpose (52 U.S.C. § 30111(a)(4)). People who share a name are never combined here, and no street addresses are shown.

Loading…

Independent expenditures (outside spending)

Independent expenditures are spent by outside groups to support or oppose a candidate without coordinating with the campaign. They are not contributions to the campaign and are not included in the receipts above. Support and opposition are shown separately.

Spent to support

$10

Outside groups spending in favor of this candidate.

GroupReported
SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION$10

Spent to oppose

$0

Outside groups spending against this candidate.

See every independent expenditure on FEC.gov

Official sources

Data from the FEC's OpenFEC service. Imported November 9, 2026.

Figures are copied from Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings and are only as complete and current as those filings. Reports are filed on a schedule, so recent money may not appear yet. FloorHoller does not alter official amounts. A campaign contribution is a lawful, public, reported act. Nothing on this page suggests that any contribution, or any amount, is improper. How this works

DiscussionAll candidates

Discuss this

Talk about Emanuel Cleaver II's campaign finance records with other FloorHoller members. Replies are limited to 200 characters, and a free account is required to post.

Choose a public username

This is the only name shown with your posts. Your Google name and email stay private. You cannot change it later.

3-20 letters, numbers or underscores

We updated our terms

Please review and accept the updated documents to keep posting, replying, voting and reporting. You can read everything without accepting.

Report this

Moderators review reports. Pick the closest reason.

Reason

Are you sure?